<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Rhetorica</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rhetorica.net/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rhetorica.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:01:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Rhetorica Canon by Cash For Gold Watches Orange County</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/the-rhetorica-canon/comment-page-1#comment-21583</link>
		<dc:creator>Cash For Gold Watches Orange County</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?page_id=7660#comment-21583</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Yep....&lt;/strong&gt;

I couldn&#039;t have said it better myself......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Yep&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t have said it better myself&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Rhetoric of Pepper Spray by steveham</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/8056.html/comment-page-1#comment-17602</link>
		<dc:creator>steveham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 19:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?p=8056#comment-17602</guid>
		<description>I agree, Tim, and the action of the non-violence on the part of the protesters and their violent treatment is certainly counter to this philosophy! It&#039;s outrageous, really!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Tim, and the action of the non-violence on the part of the protesters and their violent treatment is certainly counter to this philosophy! It&#8217;s outrageous, really!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Rhetoric of Pepper Spray by Tim</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/8056.html/comment-page-1#comment-17498</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 05:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?p=8056#comment-17498</guid>
		<description>Not all change is revolutionary and not all revolutionary change has been made through violence, so I would say it is possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all change is revolutionary and not all revolutionary change has been made through violence, so I would say it is possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Rhetoric of Pepper Spray by acline</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/8056.html/comment-page-1#comment-17487</link>
		<dc:creator>acline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?p=8056#comment-17487</guid>
		<description>Tim... That&#039;s something I&#039;ve always wondered about so-called non-violent civil disobedience -- it seems to make no sense to me unless the rhetorical intention is to force the opposition into an act of violence. And that seems to me to then require that any such situation descend into violence on all sides. That begs the question: Is all revolutionary change only possible through violence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim&#8230; That&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve always wondered about so-called non-violent civil disobedience &#8212; it seems to make no sense to me unless the rhetorical intention is to force the opposition into an act of violence. And that seems to me to then require that any such situation descend into violence on all sides. That begs the question: Is all revolutionary change only possible through violence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Rhetoric of Pepper Spray by Tim</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/8056.html/comment-page-1#comment-17465</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 15:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?p=8056#comment-17465</guid>
		<description>re: Pike, and the power he represents, is a direct threat to our culture

I think there is an audience for that truth claim. I think &quot;our culture&quot; helps define the audience. The perceived cultural threat seems to be against &quot;civil disobedience&quot; as a speech act. However, the point of disobeying is confrontation and escalation. In effect, the pepper spraying was a first order perlocutionary effect sought by the actors of disobedience for the consumption of the audience and the sought after second order effect.

I find it useful to compare the &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/dont-tase-me-bro&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Don&#039;t tase me, bro!&lt;/a&gt; meme with what we know about events surrounding the &lt;a href=&quot;http://peppersprayingcop.tumblr.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pepper spray cop&lt;/a&gt; meme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: Pike, and the power he represents, is a direct threat to our culture</p>
<p>I think there is an audience for that truth claim. I think &#8220;our culture&#8221; helps define the audience. The perceived cultural threat seems to be against &#8220;civil disobedience&#8221; as a speech act. However, the point of disobeying is confrontation and escalation. In effect, the pepper spraying was a first order perlocutionary effect sought by the actors of disobedience for the consumption of the audience and the sought after second order effect.</p>
<p>I find it useful to compare the &#8220;<a href="http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/dont-tase-me-bro" rel="nofollow">Don&#8217;t tase me, bro!</a> meme with what we know about events surrounding the <a href="http://peppersprayingcop.tumblr.com/" rel="nofollow">pepper spray cop</a> meme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook and Anonymity by Tim</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/8042.html/comment-page-1#comment-17458</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?p=8042#comment-17458</guid>
		<description>Happy Thanksgiving!

I&#039;m glad you linked to the previous post, the tiered system is a better solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Thanksgiving!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you linked to the previous post, the tiered system is a better solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook and Anonymity by listed below are</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/8042.html/comment-page-1#comment-17315</link>
		<dc:creator>listed below are</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?p=8042#comment-17315</guid>
		<description>a tremendous amount addiitional info with this kind of concern online on a website, observe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a tremendous amount addiitional info with this kind of concern online on a website, observe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook and Anonymity by Facebook and Anonynimity &#124; Reflections in the Screen</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/8042.html/comment-page-1#comment-17301</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook and Anonynimity &#124; Reflections in the Screen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?p=8042#comment-17301</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was originally published on Rhetorica. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was originally published on Rhetorica. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook and Anonymity by Vardibidian</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/8042.html/comment-page-1#comment-17274</link>
		<dc:creator>Vardibidian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 01:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?p=8042#comment-17274</guid>
		<description>Oh, I&#039;m here all right, but (as you may remember) more interested in rhetoric than in journalism, so I&#039;m reading with interest but usually don&#039;t have much to say.

I do think the tiered system is an idea worth trying, being more obviously an attempt to balance quality with inclusiveness. A group of newspapers could get together to do something like sbnation does, with a single (pseudonymous) log-in for commenting along with tiers of added responsibility for regular users that have shown they are adding value to particular sites within the network. It&#039;s labor-intensive, which is fine for a sports site where people are happy to be volunteer groundskeepers, as it were, and would probably be fine for a newspaper that were already a community website. I should check back on patch and see how they are handling it.

I wonder (by the way and off-topic) if you have looked into how newspapers and other news organizations are networking, by the way, as that seems to be one of the opportunities of the web. Something more clever than just linking to somebody else&#039;s movie reviews, I mean. Linking from a local news story to other localities&#039; stories, particularly connected to big corporations or other institutions that have both a Big National and Many Local stories. Maybe this is old stuff, just not well done in my town, which wouldn&#039;t be a surprise.

Thanks,
-V.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I&#8217;m here all right, but (as you may remember) more interested in rhetoric than in journalism, so I&#8217;m reading with interest but usually don&#8217;t have much to say.</p>
<p>I do think the tiered system is an idea worth trying, being more obviously an attempt to balance quality with inclusiveness. A group of newspapers could get together to do something like sbnation does, with a single (pseudonymous) log-in for commenting along with tiers of added responsibility for regular users that have shown they are adding value to particular sites within the network. It&#8217;s labor-intensive, which is fine for a sports site where people are happy to be volunteer groundskeepers, as it were, and would probably be fine for a newspaper that were already a community website. I should check back on patch and see how they are handling it.</p>
<p>I wonder (by the way and off-topic) if you have looked into how newspapers and other news organizations are networking, by the way, as that seems to be one of the opportunities of the web. Something more clever than just linking to somebody else&#8217;s movie reviews, I mean. Linking from a local news story to other localities&#8217; stories, particularly connected to big corporations or other institutions that have both a Big National and Many Local stories. Maybe this is old stuff, just not well done in my town, which wouldn&#8217;t be a surprise.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
-V.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook and Anonymity by acline</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/8042.html/comment-page-1#comment-17263</link>
		<dc:creator>acline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 21:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?p=8042#comment-17263</guid>
		<description>V- Hey! Long time, no see. Facebook could certainly be problematic. We&#039;ll have specifics soon enough. I think this move is going in the right direction, but I still think my idea is better: a tiered system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>V- Hey! Long time, no see. Facebook could certainly be problematic. We&#8217;ll have specifics soon enough. I think this move is going in the right direction, but I still think my idea is better: a tiered system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

