I’m late getting to this, but…
Chris Wallace asked former President Bill Clinton this question (minus the build-up and qualifying): ”Why didn’t you do more, connect the dots and put them out of business?”
I’ll leave my commentary of Clinton’s response to this: probably calculated to a certain extent (not fully scripted), i.e. he was prepared to do what he did if necessary. No one in Clinton’s position submits to an interview unprepared to react in rhetorically advantageous ways.
The question is fair to the extent that bin Laden was a known bad guy with nefarious intentions and that Clinton had tried to some extent to kill him.
I’m wondering about Clinton’s kairos–timing and proportion.
If I had been advising him about such a question–hindsight being 20/20, of course–I’d have suggested this: “Such as?” (then wait…and wait…and wait). Make Wallace come up with something. Then attack.
Clinton is a big guy who can speak in long strings of complete sentences. This make him a formidable opponent for a TV journalist. But I think some of that power was diluted by “going off” before putting Wallace on the spot intellectually.
Tag: journalism
Tag: rhetoric
Tag: politics