There are plenty of jobs for stenographers in American political journalism. It’s the safest — and easiest — job in the business. American political stenography thrives in the new multimedia/social media context. It is perfectly suited for the clickbait headline, the vacuous soundbite, the hashtag thinking, and the (apparently) declining attention span of the audience.
I’m waking Rhetorica up for the 2016 election.
Unlike years past when I covered a wide range of rhetorical issues in the press and politics, this time I’m focusing on political stenography in journalism. It occurs at all levels. I’ll be particularly focused on its practice in prestigious newspapers and self-aggrandizing cable/network news programs.
You can click that link and read some of what I’ve written about stenography in the past. But in case you don’t want to work quite that hard, what I’m talking about is the near universal practice among American political journalists not to ask — or get answers for — painfully obvious questions when politicians speak in hashtags and soundbites as if it were all so much common sense.
Here’s another way to understand it:
Stenography = writing down what sources say
Reporting = discovering and writing down the facts (about what sources say)
Here’s a short list of problems stenography causes that I published in 2009:
1. Sounds bites get substituted for facts and rational argument.
3. Intentional falsehoods achieve a cultural force equal to facts and (something like) the truth.
Let’s see what happens this time 🙂