<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stenography, Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rhetorica.net/archives/7389.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/7389.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:01:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: acline</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/7389.html/comment-page-1#comment-8010</link>
		<dc:creator>acline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?p=7389#comment-8010</guid>
		<description>Tim... Excellent find. I&#039;m going to use that in class tomorrow :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim&#8230; Excellent find. I&#8217;m going to use that in class tomorrow <img src='http://rhetorica.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/7389.html/comment-page-1#comment-8002</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?p=7389#comment-8002</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://larrycheng.com/2009/08/12/its-hard-to-get-the-news-from-the-news/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;It’s Hard To Get The News From The News&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://larrycheng.com/2009/08/12/its-hard-to-get-the-news-from-the-news/" rel="nofollow">It’s Hard To Get The News From The News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acline</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/7389.html/comment-page-1#comment-7924</link>
		<dc:creator>acline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?p=7389#comment-7924</guid>
		<description>Tim... Yes. And I&#039;m on it. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim&#8230; Yes. And I&#8217;m on it. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/7389.html/comment-page-1#comment-7923</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?p=7389#comment-7923</guid>
		<description>Hi Andy ... you asked me to remind you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andy &#8230; you asked me to remind you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acline</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/7389.html/comment-page-1#comment-7912</link>
		<dc:creator>acline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?p=7389#comment-7912</guid>
		<description>Tim... Good question. I should really post an answer on the main blog. Remind me if You don&#039;t see it by Friday.

Anna... Didn&#039;t you make that point earlier? :-) I seem to recall it. And the answer is yes. Or, perhaps, there ought to be away to refer to the &quot;proper stenography&quot; w/o using that term. Hmmmm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim&#8230; Good question. I should really post an answer on the main blog. Remind me if You don&#8217;t see it by Friday.</p>
<p>Anna&#8230; Didn&#8217;t you make that point earlier? <img src='http://rhetorica.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I seem to recall it. And the answer is yes. Or, perhaps, there ought to be away to refer to the &#8220;proper stenography&#8221; w/o using that term. Hmmmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Haynes</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/7389.html/comment-page-1#comment-7911</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?p=7389#comment-7911</guid>
		<description>It seems to me there&#039;s good [effects of] stenography and there&#039;s bad [effects of] stenography.  Bad stenography is the death panels stuff, it spreads disinformation.  But good stenography would create a written record that Joe Smith said Y, that someone a few years from now (when it transpires that not-Y had been true) could use, to hold Smith accountable.

is there a way that we could enable &quot;good stenography&quot; yet squelch &quot;bad stenography&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me there&#8217;s good [effects of] stenography and there&#8217;s bad [effects of] stenography.  Bad stenography is the death panels stuff, it spreads disinformation.  But good stenography would create a written record that Joe Smith said Y, that someone a few years from now (when it transpires that not-Y had been true) could use, to hold Smith accountable.</p>
<p>is there a way that we could enable &#8220;good stenography&#8221; yet squelch &#8220;bad stenography&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/7389.html/comment-page-1#comment-7910</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?p=7389#comment-7910</guid>
		<description>How does &quot;a poor job of calling bullshit&quot; and &quot;call[ing] bullshit inconsistently&quot; relate back to a &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://w2jig.blogspot.com/2007/11/rhetoric-beat-cunningham-frames-need.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;rhetoric beat&lt;/a&gt;&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does &#8220;a poor job of calling bullshit&#8221; and &#8220;call[ing] bullshit inconsistently&#8221; relate back to a &#8220;<a href="http://w2jig.blogspot.com/2007/11/rhetoric-beat-cunningham-frames-need.html" rel="nofollow">rhetoric beat</a>&#8220;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acline</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/7389.html/comment-page-1#comment-7909</link>
		<dc:creator>acline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?p=7389#comment-7909</guid>
		<description>Tim... Journalism does a poor job of calling bullshit. That it certainly does call bullshit inconsistently regarding certain kinds of issues simply makes it worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim&#8230; Journalism does a poor job of calling bullshit. That it certainly does call bullshit inconsistently regarding certain kinds of issues simply makes it worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/7389.html/comment-page-1#comment-7908</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?p=7389#comment-7908</guid>
		<description>I think the specific issue is relevant to which &quot;wild accusations&quot; journalism chooses to call bullshit, how loudly, and how long it takes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the specific issue is relevant to which &#8220;wild accusations&#8221; journalism chooses to call bullshit, how loudly, and how long it takes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acline</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/7389.html/comment-page-1#comment-7907</link>
		<dc:creator>acline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhetorica.net/?p=7389#comment-7907</guid>
		<description>Tim... The &quot;death panels&quot; coverage is just the latest example of an ongoing problem that affects issues of concern to all political factions. The specific issue is irrelevant. What&#039;s important is that the press has shown itself repeatedly incapable of resisting stenography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim&#8230; The &#8220;death panels&#8221; coverage is just the latest example of an ongoing problem that affects issues of concern to all political factions. The specific issue is irrelevant. What&#8217;s important is that the press has shown itself repeatedly incapable of resisting stenography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

