<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roland Hedley Lives!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rhetorica.net/archives/6838.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/6838.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:09:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: acline</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/6838.html/comment-page-1#comment-5589</link>
		<dc:creator>acline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wpp3/?p=6838#comment-5589</guid>
		<description>Tim... I don&#039;t mean to suggest simplistic reasons. Those you cite play a huge roll, too. But it is true that it is difficult to practice good journalism with few resources no matter how we got to this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim&#8230; I don&#8217;t mean to suggest simplistic reasons. Those you cite play a huge roll, too. But it is true that it is difficult to practice good journalism with few resources no matter how we got to this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/6838.html/comment-page-1#comment-5588</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wpp3/?p=6838#comment-5588</guid>
		<description>Capitalism didn&#039;t ruin journalism, journalists did. For decades journalists complained about their costumers (&lt;a href=&quot;http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/07/08/big_daddy_left.html#comment51734&quot;&gt;people are idiots who don&#039;t want to read&lt;/a&gt;, people are partisans who don&#039;t want to hear inconvenient truths, shooting-the-messenger, etc.) as their costumers complained about poor quality (inaccuracy, misleading stories based on poor understanding, etc.).

During the last decade, journalists mocked the Internet as a platform for journalism, and their customer base shrank further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Capitalism didn&#8217;t ruin journalism, journalists did. For decades journalists complained about their costumers (<a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/07/08/big_daddy_left.html#comment51734">people are idiots who don&#8217;t want to read</a>, people are partisans who don&#8217;t want to hear inconvenient truths, shooting-the-messenger, etc.) as their costumers complained about poor quality (inaccuracy, misleading stories based on poor understanding, etc.).</p>
<p>During the last decade, journalists mocked the Internet as a platform for journalism, and their customer base shrank further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acline</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/6838.html/comment-page-1#comment-5587</link>
		<dc:creator>acline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 01:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wpp3/?p=6838#comment-5587</guid>
		<description>Evans... Certainly. My question should be read far more as a desire than a description of what might actually occur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evans&#8230; Certainly. My question should be read far more as a desire than a description of what might actually occur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evans</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/6838.html/comment-page-1#comment-5586</link>
		<dc:creator>Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 00:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wpp3/?p=6838#comment-5586</guid>
		<description>&quot;Could it be that the brick-and-mortar part of the news organization can begin to shrink? How much money could be saved and then plowed back into what really counts? The journalism.&quot;

If the newspapers weren&#039;t publicly traded one might believe this was about plowing more money into journalism. Under the circumstances it is far more likely this is intended to keep plowing money into the pockets of the owners and stockholders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Could it be that the brick-and-mortar part of the news organization can begin to shrink? How much money could be saved and then plowed back into what really counts? The journalism.&#8221;</p>
<p>If the newspapers weren&#8217;t publicly traded one might believe this was about plowing more money into journalism. Under the circumstances it is far more likely this is intended to keep plowing money into the pockets of the owners and stockholders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
