<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ripping Them A New One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rhetorica.net/archives/6769.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/6769.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:01:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: acline</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/6769.html/comment-page-1#comment-5383</link>
		<dc:creator>acline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wpp3/?p=6769#comment-5383</guid>
		<description>J- Not quite. The attitude is more complex than that. The institution of journalism partly doesn&#039;t see itself as part of the problem. Its mythology teaches that it is the watchdog and so in itself doesn&#039;t need watching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J- Not quite. The attitude is more complex than that. The institution of journalism partly doesn&#8217;t see itself as part of the problem. Its mythology teaches that it is the watchdog and so in itself doesn&#8217;t need watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy D. Young</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/6769.html/comment-page-1#comment-5382</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy D. Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wpp3/?p=6769#comment-5382</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t one of the critical problems here that news organizations inherently avoid this exactly because they do not want to be held to higher standards?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t one of the critical problems here that news organizations inherently avoid this exactly because they do not want to be held to higher standards?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acline</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/6769.html/comment-page-1#comment-5381</link>
		<dc:creator>acline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wpp3/?p=6769#comment-5381</guid>
		<description>I told a classroom full of students once that the genius of the movie Network could be found in its prophesy. But, perhaps I was wrong. Perhaps we&#039;ve moved farther down that road to...where?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I told a classroom full of students once that the genius of the movie Network could be found in its prophesy. But, perhaps I was wrong. Perhaps we&#8217;ve moved farther down that road to&#8230;where?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/6769.html/comment-page-1#comment-5380</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wpp3/?p=6769#comment-5380</guid>
		<description>But seriously, I don&#039;t think Chayefsky could have imagined this scenario.

- Sen. Bob Casey picks Latrobe, Pa., as a backdrop for his endorsement of Obama because of it&#039;s &quot;blue-collar credentials.&quot;

- The New York Times follows up with a story speculating about how many of Latrobe&#039;s residents&#039; objections to Obama may be cover for being uncomfortable voting for a black man.

- Controversy &quot;erupts&quot; after said black man comments on said blue-collar white folk&#039;s bitterness to a bunch of rich white people in, of all places, San Francisco.

- ABC decides to engineer a confrontation between Obama and one of the people quoted in the NYT story. Said person asks if Obama &quot;believes in the flag.&quot;

- McClatchy follows up with flag lady, who says her concerns really have nothing to do with the flag.  She&#039;s been through some tough economic times, is, um, &lt;i&gt;bitter&lt;/i&gt; about it and is angry at Obama for taking &quot;everything so nonchalantly.&quot; (Perhaps instead of mnaking cryptic comments about flag pins, she should have said &lt;i&gt;&#039;I&#039;m a HUMAN BEING, Goddamnit! My life has VALUE!&#039;&lt;/i&gt;)

- George Stephanopoulos, who in the 1992 docudrama &lt;i&gt;The War Room&lt;/i&gt; was shocked - shocked! - by a reporter asked him about his candidates&#039; marital infidelity and tells said reporter in so many words that &quot;he&#039;ll never work in this town again!&quot; now tells us that these are the kinds of issues the &#039;Merican people are interested in.

Jaysus, somebody please call rewrite!&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But seriously, I don&#8217;t think Chayefsky could have imagined this scenario.</p>
<p>- Sen. Bob Casey picks Latrobe, Pa., as a backdrop for his endorsement of Obama because of it&#8217;s &#8220;blue-collar credentials.&#8221;</p>
<p>- The New York Times follows up with a story speculating about how many of Latrobe&#8217;s residents&#8217; objections to Obama may be cover for being uncomfortable voting for a black man.</p>
<p>- Controversy &#8220;erupts&#8221; after said black man comments on said blue-collar white folk&#8217;s bitterness to a bunch of rich white people in, of all places, San Francisco.</p>
<p>- ABC decides to engineer a confrontation between Obama and one of the people quoted in the NYT story. Said person asks if Obama &#8220;believes in the flag.&#8221;</p>
<p>- McClatchy follows up with flag lady, who says her concerns really have nothing to do with the flag.  She&#8217;s been through some tough economic times, is, um, <i>bitter</i> about it and is angry at Obama for taking &#8220;everything so nonchalantly.&#8221; (Perhaps instead of mnaking cryptic comments about flag pins, she should have said <i>&#8216;I&#8217;m a HUMAN BEING, Goddamnit! My life has VALUE!&#8217;</i>)</p>
<p>- George Stephanopoulos, who in the 1992 docudrama <i>The War Room</i> was shocked &#8211; shocked! &#8211; by a reporter asked him about his candidates&#8217; marital infidelity and tells said reporter in so many words that &#8220;he&#8217;ll never work in this town again!&#8221; now tells us that these are the kinds of issues the &#8216;Merican people are interested in.</p>
<p>Jaysus, somebody please call rewrite!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acline</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/6769.html/comment-page-1#comment-5379</link>
		<dc:creator>acline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wpp3/?p=6769#comment-5379</guid>
		<description>Hahaha! Good one :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha! Good one <img src='http://rhetorica.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/6769.html/comment-page-1#comment-5378</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wpp3/?p=6769#comment-5378</guid>
		<description>&quot;Look, all I&#039;m saying is if you&#039;re going to hustle, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0013118/quotes&quot;&gt;at least do it right&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Look, all I&#8217;m saying is if you&#8217;re going to hustle, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0013118/quotes">at least do it right</a>.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

