<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Voice of Panic, part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rhetorica.net/archives/6705.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/6705.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:07:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah Arney</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/6705.html/comment-page-1#comment-5315</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah Arney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wpp3/?p=6705#comment-5315</guid>
		<description>No problem. I love reading your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem. I love reading your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acline</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/6705.html/comment-page-1#comment-5314</link>
		<dc:creator>acline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wpp3/?p=6705#comment-5314</guid>
		<description>Noah-- I will get to this on Monday. Thanks for the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noah&#8211; I will get to this on Monday. Thanks for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah Arney</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/6705.html/comment-page-1#comment-5313</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah Arney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wpp3/?p=6705#comment-5313</guid>
		<description>I disagree with the NYT on two points.  First the way they have written it seems to say (but doesn&#039;t actually) that Obama made his defense after she made her comments on it.  I find that just a bit odd since unless you are reading very carefully (not likely as most people read a newspaper to get their news quickly) you will assume that Obama made his comments in response to hers, instead of the other way around.  The second issue I have with NYTs article is that her &quot;Change you can Xerox&quot; (a prewritten sound bite if I&#039;ve ever heard one) did not get &quot;loud groans and some applause&quot;, it actually got loud boos with a bit of polite applause.

Also, they didn&#039;t though mention the most important part of that section.  That particular section begins with Obama responding to a question about his use of his friends words in one of his speeches.  He uses that question as a springboard to bring up one of his policy items very deftly.  The floor is then passed to Hillary, and she makes her comment.

If you watch Hillary&#039;s face as Obama begins responding she seems very pleased with herself.  Almost like a smirk.  And why not?  He just walked into a trap that she was well prepared to use to her advantage.  But as he shifts the question her smile fades, as if she realizes that he won&#039;t end with something she can pounce on right away.  He closes with the line &quot;we shouldn&#039;t be spending time tearing each other down, we should be lifting the country up&quot;.  Not exactly something you want to respond to with an attack.  But still the topic of plagiarism was too good for her to pass up, and she had a great line prepped.

So she went for it.  She wasn&#039;t nearly as confident as she started speaking as she had been when Obama began responding to the question.

And then she gets booed.  Because regardless of the facts behind the matter, what the attendees saw was Obama step above personal attacks, followed by Hillary making one.

The boos were not for the line (which was fairly good), but for her timing.

I&#039;m interested in your comments after seeing it.  If you missed it, the relevant part is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHkcyxIqpvk

I&#039;ll be checking back to see what you thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the NYT on two points.  First the way they have written it seems to say (but doesn&#8217;t actually) that Obama made his defense after she made her comments on it.  I find that just a bit odd since unless you are reading very carefully (not likely as most people read a newspaper to get their news quickly) you will assume that Obama made his comments in response to hers, instead of the other way around.  The second issue I have with NYTs article is that her &#8220;Change you can Xerox&#8221; (a prewritten sound bite if I&#8217;ve ever heard one) did not get &#8220;loud groans and some applause&#8221;, it actually got loud boos with a bit of polite applause.</p>
<p>Also, they didn&#8217;t though mention the most important part of that section.  That particular section begins with Obama responding to a question about his use of his friends words in one of his speeches.  He uses that question as a springboard to bring up one of his policy items very deftly.  The floor is then passed to Hillary, and she makes her comment.</p>
<p>If you watch Hillary&#8217;s face as Obama begins responding she seems very pleased with herself.  Almost like a smirk.  And why not?  He just walked into a trap that she was well prepared to use to her advantage.  But as he shifts the question her smile fades, as if she realizes that he won&#8217;t end with something she can pounce on right away.  He closes with the line &#8220;we shouldn&#8217;t be spending time tearing each other down, we should be lifting the country up&#8221;.  Not exactly something you want to respond to with an attack.  But still the topic of plagiarism was too good for her to pass up, and she had a great line prepped.</p>
<p>So she went for it.  She wasn&#8217;t nearly as confident as she started speaking as she had been when Obama began responding to the question.</p>
<p>And then she gets booed.  Because regardless of the facts behind the matter, what the attendees saw was Obama step above personal attacks, followed by Hillary making one.</p>
<p>The boos were not for the line (which was fairly good), but for her timing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested in your comments after seeing it.  If you missed it, the relevant part is here: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHkcyxIqpvk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHkcyxIqpvk</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be checking back to see what you thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
