Comments on: You cannot be serious!…

By: Sneakeasy's Joint

Sneakeasy's Joint — Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:50:34 +0000

Sneak’s wide world of Blogging 22

This series is dedicated to the proposition that Blogging is a prime example of the saying

By: Sneakeasy's Joint

Sneakeasy's Joint — Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:45:14 +0000

Sneak’s wide world of Blogging 22

This series is dedicated to the proposition that Blogging is a prime example of the saying

By: BatesLine

BatesLine — Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:21:08 +0000

“I’d be hiring him”

I am highly complimented by this comment from “Sven Haagendaas” in response to Rhetorica’s post on the World’s attack: Aside from the stunning ignorance from a newspaper about fair use, what’s amazing to me is how the World jumped on the wrong side of …

By: acline

acline — Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:49:30 +0000

S- Yes. I read every word of that post. It must be hell to have someone like that on yer ass

By: CCR 711: Network(ed) Rhetorics

CCR 711: Network(ed) Rhetorics — Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:00:42 +0000

a failed attempt

andrew cline at rhetorica.net carries out this echo-driven act of potential piracy: the newspaper complained that the blogger was quoting from/linking to them without their permission; cline picked it up & quoted the complaint (& linked to the paper, a…

By: CCR 711: Network(ed) Rhetorics

CCR 711: Network(ed) Rhetorics — Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:58:54 +0000

a failed attempt

By: Sven

Sven — Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:18:27 +0000

Aside from the stunning ignorance from a newspaper about fair use, what's amazing to me is how the World jumped on the wrong side of a debate about transparency and just keeps digging. Here's Bates' devastating (and fact-based!) takedown of a World editorial on it's conflict of interest in the airline "scandal." No wonder they don't want him using their own words against them! If I were the World's owners, I wouldn't be suing Bates, I'd be hiring him. The guy got me interested in Tulsa politics, and I live 1,500 miles away.