<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is blogging?&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rhetorica.net/archives/2996.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/2996.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:01:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: acline</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/2996.html/comment-page-1#comment-3239</link>
		<dc:creator>acline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 14:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wpp3/?p=2996#comment-3239</guid>
		<description>Tim... Yeah, that&#039;s the idea. I think you have something there. We may need to come up with a catchier name for it :-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim&#8230; Yeah, that&#8217;s the idea. I think you have something there. We may need to come up with a catchier name for it <img src='http://rhetorica.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/2996.html/comment-page-1#comment-3238</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wpp3/?p=2996#comment-3238</guid>
		<description>One more quick thought ...

There does seem to be a &quot;Poor journalism&quot; bias on blogs that parallels your &quot;bad news&quot; bias. 

Poor journalism in MSM &quot;sells&quot; blogs. Exposing/Fisking it seems an important structural component, capturing both blogging&#039;s reliance on MSM and its interaction with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more quick thought &#8230;</p>
<p>There does seem to be a &#8220;Poor journalism&#8221; bias on blogs that parallels your &#8220;bad news&#8221; bias. </p>
<p>Poor journalism in MSM &#8220;sells&#8221; blogs. Exposing/Fisking it seems an important structural component, capturing both blogging&#8217;s reliance on MSM and its interaction with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/2996.html/comment-page-1#comment-3237</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wpp3/?p=2996#comment-3237</guid>
		<description>What a great post to come back with!

re: &quot;blogging has reached the cultural limelight&quot; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://powerlineblog.com/archives/008963.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Blog of the Year&lt;/a&gt;

Perhaps something of a quick blog-lit review on structure? Call it the beginnings of a blogiography? 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://instapundit.com/archives/019889.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Expression&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;But people blog so that they can express themselves -- to be producers, not consumers -- and we see this impulse across the world of new and alternative media.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2004/10/16/sinclair_ctd.html#comment11239&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Filter/Gatekeeping&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Being a member of the Fourth Estate is more about process than goals. Journalism is about increasing information flow and transparency. That doesn&#039;t appear to be the process that Sinclair supports. That isn&#039;t really the process that any government-licensed gatekeeper supports.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://instapundit.com/archives/019932.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Visibility&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;... got more overall attention for his argument by making it in the blogosphere than it would have gotten if he&#039;d printed it in the rather large conventional paper whose opinion pages he runs.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2004/12/02/rect_glsr.html#comment14663&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Research/Archive&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;In the course of a rambling panel discussion I had occasion to ask this crowd of people--maybe 150 working mainly in Big Media&#039;s online news industry--whether they knew that their carefully-researched article on the big polluting oil company was never going to become part of Google search and would therefore be lost to users who overwhelmingly go to the Web for research. Why? I said. &quot;Because your links expire or they hit a pay wall or you asked them to register.&quot; I said you&#039;re nowhere when it comes to Search from a user&#039;s perspective. No matter how good it is, your stuff does not show up.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great post to come back with!</p>
<p>re: &#8220;blogging has reached the cultural limelight&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://powerlineblog.com/archives/008963.php" rel="nofollow">Blog of the Year</a></p>
<p>Perhaps something of a quick blog-lit review on structure? Call it the beginnings of a blogiography? </p>
<p><a href="http://instapundit.com/archives/019889.php" rel="nofollow">Expression</a><br />
<blockquote>But people blog so that they can express themselves &#8212; to be producers, not consumers &#8212; and we see this impulse across the world of new and alternative media.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2004/10/16/sinclair_ctd.html#comment11239" rel="nofollow">Filter/Gatekeeping</a><br />
<blockquote>Being a member of the Fourth Estate is more about process than goals. Journalism is about increasing information flow and transparency. That doesn&#8217;t appear to be the process that Sinclair supports. That isn&#8217;t really the process that any government-licensed gatekeeper supports.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://instapundit.com/archives/019932.php" rel="nofollow">Visibility</a><br />
<blockquote>&#8230; got more overall attention for his argument by making it in the blogosphere than it would have gotten if he&#8217;d printed it in the rather large conventional paper whose opinion pages he runs.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2004/12/02/rect_glsr.html#comment14663" rel="nofollow">Research/Archive</a><br />
<blockquote>In the course of a rambling panel discussion I had occasion to ask this crowd of people&#8211;maybe 150 working mainly in Big Media&#8217;s online news industry&#8211;whether they knew that their carefully-researched article on the big polluting oil company was never going to become part of Google search and would therefore be lost to users who overwhelmingly go to the Web for research. Why? I said. &#8220;Because your links expire or they hit a pay wall or you asked them to register.&#8221; I said you&#8217;re nowhere when it comes to Search from a user&#8217;s perspective. No matter how good it is, your stuff does not show up.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

