<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shifting fields of discourse&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rhetorica.net/archives/2819.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/2819.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:01:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: acline</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/2819.html/comment-page-1#comment-2985</link>
		<dc:creator>acline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2004 09:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wpp3/?p=2819#comment-2985</guid>
		<description>RH-- Not remedial help--merely bringing theory and practice together. I need to to that more often.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RH&#8211; Not remedial help&#8211;merely bringing theory and practice together. I need to to that more often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resident Harriden</title>
		<link>http://rhetorica.net/archives/2819.html/comment-page-1#comment-2984</link>
		<dc:creator>Resident Harriden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2004 09:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wpp3/?p=2819#comment-2984</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the x=y breakdown of the Weintraub essay and your noetic field theory. I understood the Weintraub piece very well, but could not have tied it to the noetic field theory without your useful comparison. I&#039;m sure I&#039;m the only Rhetorica reader requiring remedial help, and I do appreciate your efforts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the x=y breakdown of the Weintraub essay and your noetic field theory. I understood the Weintraub piece very well, but could not have tied it to the noetic field theory without your useful comparison. I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;m the only Rhetorica reader requiring remedial help, and I do appreciate your efforts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

