Blogging policy…
A few weeks ago, after acknowledging an error I made, I said that I would post my blogging policy, i.e. rules I try to live by. I have posted a link to the Rhetorica Blogging Policy in the left-and sidebar. Because all texts should be open to review and critique, I welcome your comments and suggestions regarding this policy.










Great idea - explicitly listing your policy seems very appropriate for such a project.
One question: do you think you could expand a bit on point 4? I think your blog is perfectly useful for non-academic readers such as myself; however, not being in academia I don’t think of ‘academic’ as being on the same axis as ‘polemic’ - the two adjectives strike me as orthogonal.
Good point. I need to explain how I’m opposing (or linearizing…hey, if yer gonna use “orthogonal,” then I can make up “linearizing” haha!) those two terms. I will make that change. But, quickly (and superficially):
Academic stance: I try to understand and explain a situation based on current/accepted theories for the purpose of persuading my audience to think critically about an issue in all its complexity. With this stance, I am more concerned with theory/practice than ideology.
Polemic stance: I try to persuade my audience that my way of thinking is right or correct and other ways of thinking are wrong or incorrect. With this stance, I am more concerned with ideology than theory/practice.
Looks good. It would require only minor generalization for many bloggers to use it, if they cared. My personal downfall is #7 — the “promptly” part.
Good idea…I think I’ll post a line at the end offering it to other bloggers.