Too many cooks?…
Can an open-source site “correct” a badly written (e.g. typos, factual errors) article? A.J. Jacobs has tried to find out. You can check out the action here. Esquire will publish the results.
A good point [emphasis added]:
[Wikipedia Founder Jimmy] Wales pointed to a recent experiment in which The Los Angeles Times tried a “wikitorial” in which its readers could collaboratively work on editorials.
“It was more or less a complete disaster,” Wales said, “because they didn’t have a community built up, so they just had tons and tons of random people (involved). They had to take it down because there was too much vandalism.”










I was just thinking this morning, somewhat relatedly, about the paradox of the Internet. It’s a venue for individual expression free of the usual editorial “gatekeepers.” But in another sense, writers on the ‘net have exchanged a handful of editors for thousands. Blog readers [ahem] in particular aren’t shy about picking apart sentences like piranha on a wounded tapir [take that, Austin attorney Bill White!].
Closer to the topic at hand, I came across this in an essay about newsroom samizdat: